Indiana standards alignment

What we don't claim

A standards page is only worth reading if the omissions are honest too. We looked at these and left them out:

• Mathematics — nothing. This catalog does no mathematics instruction, so it meets no Indiana mathematics standard.
• Science — almost nothing. There is no laboratory work, no investigation and no scientific modelling here. Indiana is not an NGSS state; we checked and claim no Indiana science standard. (Our one partial NGSS claim is for Washington, D.C., where NGSS applies.)
• Most of the U.S. Government standards we checked. USG.1.4 (types of government: monarchy, oligarchy, totalitarianism, anarchy), USG.1.5 (unitary vs confederate vs federal), USG.1.6 (constitutionalism, rule of law, limited government, popular sovereignty as named principles), USG.2.2 (compromise at the Constitutional Convention), USG.2.4-2.6 (founding ideas, civic identity, and civic values as a set), USG.3.1 (the four-part characterization of U.S. government), USG.3.3 (enumerated/implied/DENIED powers in BOTH constitutions — our course teaches enumerated/implied/reserved/concurrent, U.S. only), USG.3.9 (Benjamin Harrison), USG.3.10 (political parties' progression and ideologies), USG.3.13 (media influence on public opinion — our media-literacy course is consumer protection, not political media analysis), all of USG.4 (foreign affairs), and USG.5.8 — the courses do not genuinely teach these, so we do not claim them.
• Indiana Economics has no standard on unions. We checked the 2026 Economics document (and the 2023 edition) for the labor-history courses: Indiana's Economics standards contain no standard on labor unions or collective bargaining, so we cite none. The absence is in the standards, not the lessons.
• USH.8.6 (deindustrialization) for the unions course. The History of Unions reads union decline honestly (PATCO, automation vs. trade) but does not teach the causes and consequences of deindustrialization as such. Close, but not the standard.
• PE performance standards — all of them. Every indicator that asks a student to DEMONSTRATE motor skill, participate, or exhibit behavior during physical activity (all of Standard 1, the participation indicators of Standard 3, and Standard 4's etiquette-in-play) is out of reach of an online course, however good its knowledge content. We claim knowledge-side indicators only.
• Health standards for the marketing course beyond HS.3.1. HS.2.3 (evaluate the effect of media and social media on health behaviors) was considered: Spotting Misleading Marketing evaluates marketing claims about health products, which is HS.3.1's skill, not an analysis of media's effect on health behavior. We claim the one that fits.
• The AI-literacy ladder, the language courses, and Learning How to Learn — deferred, not denied. Indiana's closest frameworks (K-12 Computer Science, World Languages, Employability Skills) have not been fetched and verified yet. Our rule is fetch-or-don't-cite, so these courses carry no Indiana claims this pass. They are queued for a later mapping pass.
• E.4.1, E.4.2, E.3.2, USH.9.3 — the Commodity Map rejections, still rejected. Public goods are never taught; corrective (Pigouvian) taxation is never taught as a policy tool; the four market structures are named, never taught as a unit; and “media in the democratic process” is too thin to stand up. See the source file for the full reasoning.