Skip to content

Courses

← Home

214 courses

🕒 Coming soon

California Civics: How Your State Government Works

A practical, non-partisan guide to how the state of California governs itself, and how you take part where you live. You'll learn California's 1879 constitution (one of the longest and most-amended in the nation) and its powerful tools of DIRECT DEMOCRACY: the initiative, referendum, and recall added in the 1911 Progressive era; the three state branches, including a plural executive of separately-elected constitutional officers (the Lieutenant Governor is elected independently, not on a ticket with the Governor); the 120-seat Legislature (an 80-member Assembly and a 40-member Senate); and the courts (a 7-justice Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and Superior Courts in all 58 counties), whose appellate justices are appointed and then confirmed by voters in retention elections. You'll learn how a bill becomes a California law (including the Governor's line-item veto and the two-thirds override) and California's local government (58 counties, charter vs. general-law cities, thousands of special districts, and NO townships). Finally you'll learn California's distinctive elections rules (automatic and same-day registration, a ballot mailed to every active voter, the top-two primary, and the citizen initiative) before a lesson on how to get involved. Cited to California's own official sources (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov, sos.ca.gov, courts.ca.gov). Because state facts vary and change, the course flags time-sensitive items (like turnout-dependent initiative signature thresholds and judicial retention timing) and points you to California's own sources to confirm the current rule.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Capstone: Choose a Form and Defend It

The final course of the 'How a Business Is Formed' path, and its graded capstone. It is not legal, tax, or financial advice, and it says so throughout, including inside the assignment: it teaches you what to ASK a lawyer or accountant, not the answer for your situation. This course does not teach a new form. It teaches you to REASON: given a real scenario, read it into the four decisions (who pays the debts, who pays the tax, who owns it and how ownership moves, and who decides), choose a plausible form, and defend that choice against all four decisions and against one specific alternative you rejected. It pulls the whole path together, the four decisions and the formation documents from course 1, the US forms and the S-corp-as-a-tax-election from course 2, cooperatives and one member one vote from course 3, the invent-an-entity story of financing without access from course 4, the foreign forms from course 5, and governance from course 6. You will work three or four scenarios end to end, a solo freelancer, a founder raising venture money, a worker collective, and a community nonprofit, watching the trade-offs and the honest 'it depends' at each step, without asserting a single invented statute, rate, or fee. Then the graded capstone asks you to do it yourself: pick a scenario, name a form, and defend it against the four and against a named alternative, to a rubric. You are not proving you know the one right answer. You are proving you know the questions.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Cooperatives

A cited, high-school-and-up course on the business form most people have used without ever reading: the cooperative. It is not legal, tax or financial advice, and it says so throughout. The organizing idea is one line, and the whole course is a consequence of it: a cooperative answers the ownership and governance questions with ONE MEMBER, ONE VOTE, not one share, one vote, which makes capital the servant of the members rather than their master. You will read the co-op against the four decisions from course 1 (liability, taxation, ownership and transfer, governance), then meet the Rochdale Pioneers who opened a store in 1844 and left behind the principles the world still uses, codified today as the seven cooperative principles of the International Co-operative Alliance. You will learn the five main types, worker, consumer, producer, housing and purchasing, and then study three worked cases that prove the form is not a curiosity: Mondragon, one of the largest worker cooperatives in the world, and the honest debate about whether it still lives up to its ideals; the rural electric cooperatives that, under the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, brought power to an America the private utilities would not serve; and the credit union, a financial cooperative built under the Federal Credit Union Act of 1934 that a large share of Americans belong to without thinking of it as a co-op at all. The last section takes on the money and governance question head on: how a co-op shares surplus through patronage dividends, why raising member capital is its hardest problem, and how the whole structure can be reversed through demutualization, the same move the building societies made in the financing course. The capstone asks you to design a cooperative for a real scenario and defend its member governance against a plain corporation, in the language of the four decisions. Where accounts disagree, this course teaches the disagreement rather than smoothing it over.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Financing Without Access

A cited, high-school-and-up course on the oldest problem in business: how do you finance anything when the credit system will not have you? It is not legal, tax, financial or religious advice, and it says so throughout. The through-line is a single idea, tested across the world: when the capital system excludes you, you invent an entity. You will meet the fraternal benefit society and the friendly society, the burial club and industrial insurance, the building and loan association that carried excluded families into homeownership, the rotating savings and credit association that runs under a dozen names on six continents (susu, tanda, chit fund, hui, kye, ekub, tontine), and the structures of Islamic finance that finance real things without charging interest at all (murabaha, ijara, mudaraba, musharaka, sukuk, takaful). This is the general case of which the shipped course 'What They Built' is a worked example, where fraternal orders and building-and-loans turned out to be entity choices, and it extends the method of course 1, 'What a Business Entity Actually Is': every one of these is a different answer to the four decisions. Along the way you will learn to read any financing workaround the same way, by asking which door was closed, what pool replaced it, and who bears the risk. The capstone asks you to document one real financing-without-access institution and show how its entity choice fit its constraint. Where accounts disagree, this course teaches the disagreement rather than smoothing it over.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Forms of Government, Honestly

A course about the labels we put on governments, and why sorting the world's states into 'democracy,' 'autocracy,' 'monarchy,' or 'republic' is a contested argument, not a vocabulary quiz. It is course 2 of the path whose method course, Who Has the Power to Do This?, taught you to read authority from the primary record. Here you learn the classical forms and what they actually mean (democracy, republic, monarchy, autocracy, oligarchy, theocracy), and then the harder and more useful skill: how to read a classification critically. The heart of the course is that the four major measurement projects, V-Dem at the University of Gothenburg, the Polity project, Freedom House, and the Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index, rank the same countries differently, on published methodologies, because they define democracy differently and measure different things. You will learn what each project measures, who codes it, and the four reasons their rankings diverge, especially for the hard cases in the middle: hybrid regimes, competitive authoritarianism, one-party states, and constitutional monarchies that are functionally democracies. It closes with a map of who measures democracy and from where, and a capstone: classify one real country by two different indices and explain the gap between them from the published methodologies. The course never asserts a country's current score from memory; it teaches you to read the current report yourself.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Georgia Civics: How Your State Government Works

A practical, non-partisan guide to how the state of Georgia governs itself, and how you take part where you live. You'll learn Georgia's 1983 constitution (the most recent of the state's several constitutions) and why Georgia has NO citizen initiative: constitutional amendments are proposed by the General Assembly (a two-thirds vote of each house) and then ratified by voters. You'll learn the three state branches: a plural executive of separately-elected constitutional officers (the Lieutenant Governor is elected on their own, not on a ticket with the Governor, and presides over the Senate), plus the Attorney General, Secretary of State, and several commissioners; the 236-seat General Assembly (a 180-member House and a 56-member Senate); and the courts (a 9-justice Supreme Court and a 15-judge Court of Appeals whose members are chosen in NONPARTISAN statewide elections). You'll learn how a bill becomes a Georgia law (including the Governor's veto and the two-thirds override) and Georgia's local government: 159 counties (the SECOND-MOST of any state, after Texas), home rule, consolidated city-county governments like Athens-Clarke and Columbus-Muscogee, and NO townships. Finally you'll learn Georgia's distinctive elections rules: photo ID, in-person early voting, no-excuse absentee-by-mail (with the recent SB 202 changes), and the MAJORITY-VOTE RUNOFF system that sends the top two to a second election when no one wins outright, before a lesson on how to get involved. Cited to Georgia's own official sources (legis.ga.gov, sos.ga.gov, gasupreme.us / georgiacourts.gov, and the 1983 Constitution). Because state facts vary and change, the course flags time-sensitive items (like the recent SB 202 election-law changes and current ID/deadline rules) and points you to Georgia's own sources to confirm the current rule.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Governance: Who Actually Decides

A cited, high-school-and-up course on corporate and organizational governance, and the sixth course in the 'How a Business Is Formed' path. It is not legal or financial advice, and it says so throughout: it teaches you what to ASK a lawyer or a governance professional, not the answer for a real company or a real investment. Course 1 taught that any entity is a bundle of four decisions, and governance was the fourth: who gets to decide? This course takes that one decision to its depth. The spine is the gap between OWNING a business and DECIDING for it. In a large company the owners are many and scattered, and the people who actually run it are few, so governance is the set of devices that keep the deciders answerable to the owners. You will learn what a board of directors is and does, how directors are elected, why independent directors and board committees exist, and the long argument over whose interests a company serves: shareholders alone, or a wider set of stakeholders. You will learn fiduciary duty, the highest obligation the law puts on a director, split into the duty of care (protected by the business judgment rule) and the duty of loyalty (which conflicts of interest test). You will see how founders concentrate control through dual-class, super-voting shares, and how other systems answer the same question differently: the German two-tier board with worker codetermination, the cooperative's one member one vote, and the nonprofit board that answers to a mission rather than to owners. The capstone asks you to read a real governance structure, say who actually decides, and find where a minority owner's protection comes from.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Governments Without States

Course 7 of the path whose method course, Who Has the Power to Do This?, taught the four questions (who acted, under what authority, where the power comes from, who can overturn it) and the vertical stack of national and subnational government. This course is about the authority that stack leaves out: governance that happens in bodies that are NOT sovereign states. It opens with the question underneath the whole subject, what even makes a state a state, teaching the Montevideo Convention's four criteria (1933) and the long argument between the declarative and constitutive theories of recognition. Then it climbs above the state to the supranational bodies: the European Union, which is neither a country nor an ordinary treaty organization but its own autonomous legal order (Van Gend en Loos, 1963; Costa v ENEL, 1964); the United Nations, an organization of sovereign equals rather than a world government (UN Charter, 1945); and the African Union (2002), successor to the OAU. Then it turns to the hardest case, unrecognised and contested states, taught neutrally: the course describes the recognition disagreement, attributes each claim, reports the documented facts, and does not adjudicate anyone's status. Finally it comes down BELOW the state to self-governing communities, the homeowners association that governs by covenant, the housing co-op that governs by membership, the union that governs by collective bargaining, and the mutual-aid network that governs by voluntary agreement, which is the hand-off to the business path, because each holds its power through an entity and an instrument rather than through sovereignty. It closes with a capstone: find a body with real authority over someone that is not a sovereign state, and map where its power comes from. This course teaches how to read authority. It is not legal advice, and it does not take sides in any sovereignty dispute.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

How Countries Constitute Themselves

The course about the constitution itself: the document course 1 kept walking the chain of authority up to, and the machinery every country builds to say who holds power and how it is limited. It is course 3 of the path whose method course, Who Has the Power to Do This?, already taught the four questions and the vertical stack, and it treats that course as its prerequisite. You will learn to read any constitution on three axes. The first is the horizontal question: who holds executive power, and how is it linked to the legislature? That is the difference between a parliamentary system (where the executive sits in the legislature and survives on its confidence), a presidential system (where a separately elected president holds executive power for a fixed term), and a semi-presidential system (a president and a prime minister at once), and you will learn the trade-offs and the genuine scholarly fight over whether presidentialism is more fragile and whether semi-presidential is even a coherent category. The second axis is territorial: federal or unitary. The third is the form: codified into one written document or uncodified and scattered, as in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Israel, and rigid or flexible to amend. Then the course turns to how constitutions are actually made, taught through four real cases on four routes: the United States in 1787 by a convention that then had to be ratified, South Africa in 1996 by a negotiated transition a court had to certify, Japan in 1947 by a text the occupying power largely wrote, and Germany in 1949 by Germans drafting at home inside limits the Allies set. It closes with a world map of constitutional systems and a capstone: trace how one real constitution was made and classify its system from the primary documents. This course teaches how to read authority. It is not legal advice.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

How Other Countries Form Businesses

A cited, high-school-and-up tour of how businesses are formed outside the United States, and the fifth course in the 'How a Business Is Formed' path. It is not legal or tax advice, and it says so throughout, doubly so for foreign law you cannot casually check: it teaches you what to ASK a professional, not the answer for your situation. Course 1 gave you the method, that any entity is a bundle of FOUR decisions (who pays the debts, who pays the tax, who owns it and how ownership moves, and who decides), and course 2 walked the US menu as the baseline. This course carries the same four questions abroad to prove the one thing the US baseline cannot: the American set of forms is not universal. You will read the United Kingdom's private limited company, public limited company, and the community interest company with its asset lock; Germany's GmbH and AG, their two-tier board, and Mitbestimmung, the mandatory worker representation on the supervisory boards of large companies that connects straight to the unions track; France's rigid SARL and flexible SAS; Japan's kabushiki kaisha; the Nordic countries, where the one-member-one-vote cooperative the US treats as niche is a mainstream, mass-membership institution; China's state-owned enterprises and the VIE structure, a contractual workaround of contested legality that is not an entity type at all; and India's private limited company and its Section 8 not-for-profit company. Every difference is read as a policy choice with consequences, not an accident of translation, and where a form's legal standing is genuinely debated, the VIE above all, the course teaches the uncertainty rather than faking an answer. The capstone asks you to match a foreign form to its nearest US form using the four decisions, and then to name, honestly, what does not translate.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

How Power Changes Hands

The course about the moment authority moves from one set of hands to another, and it has two halves. The first half treats elections as machines: the same ballots, counted under different rules, produce different winners. You will see one identical set of votes seat three different candidates under three different systems, and then learn the moving parts that make that happen: first-past-the-post and the two-party pull of Duverger's law, wasted votes and the spoiler effect, party-list proportional representation, district magnitude and thresholds, ranked-choice or instant-runoff, and mixed-member proportional. The claim underneath all of it is that the counting rule, not the votes alone, picks the winner, which is why changing the rule is itself a way of changing who holds power. The second half leaves the ballot box for the routes power takes when elections are not the mechanism: coups seized from inside the state, revolutions driven from below, negotiated transitions like Poland's Round Table in 1989 and South Africa between 1990 and 1994, and term limits as a design choice that schedules the handover in advance. It is course 8 of the path whose method course, Who Has the Power to Do This?, taught the four questions, and it is the general case of that course's fourth question, who can overturn it, asked about the rulers themselves. It builds on that method and complements the constitution course without repeating it. This course teaches how to read the rules by which power changes hands. It is not legal or political advice, and it takes no side in any contested election or dispute.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

New York Civics: How Your State Government Works

A practical, non-partisan guide to how the state of New York governs itself, and how you take part where you live. You'll learn New York's 1894 constitution and its distinctive automatic 20-year ballot question ("shall we hold a constitutional convention?"); the three state branches, including a separately-elected Attorney General and Comptroller and New York's famously INVERTED court names (the "Supreme Court" is the TRIAL court, while the "Court of Appeals" is the state's HIGHEST court, whose judges the Governor APPOINTS from a nominating commission's list with State Senate confirmation); how a bill becomes a New York law in a 150-member Assembly and 63-member Senate (a two-thirds override); local government across New York's 62 counties (including New York City's five boroughs) with strong home rule; and New York's elections rules: early voting, no-excuse early mail voting alongside excuse-required absentee ballots, closed party primaries, and NO statewide citizen initiative. It closes on how to get involved where you live. Cited to New York's own official sources (nysenate.gov, nyassembly.gov, dos.ny.gov, nycourts.gov, cjn.ny.gov, elections.ny.gov) and the State Constitution. Because state facts vary and change, the course flags time-sensitive items (like the post-2019 early-mail-voting change and the Governor/Lieutenant-Governor joint-ticket reform) and points you to New York's own sources to confirm the current rule.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

North Carolina Civics: How Your State Government Works

A practical, non-partisan guide to how the state of North Carolina governs itself, and how you take part where you live. You'll learn North Carolina's THIRD constitution (adopted 1971) and its amendment path: the General Assembly proposes by a three-fifths vote and the VOTERS ratify, because NC has NO citizen initiative; the three branches, including the COUNCIL OF STATE, a large plural executive of TEN separately-elected statewide officers (Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State, Auditor, Treasurer, Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the Commissioners of Agriculture, Insurance, and Labor); a General Assembly of a 120-member House and a 50-member Senate where, famously, the governor had NO veto until 1997 (NC was the last state to grant one) and a veto is overridden by THREE-FIFTHS, not two-thirds; and appellate judges elected in PARTISAN races. It covers how a bill becomes a North Carolina law, local government across NC's 100 counties (a board of commissioners, limited home rule under Dillon's Rule, municipalities, and NO townships as government), and NC's elections: photo voter ID (recently in effect after years of litigation), no-excuse absentee, early one-stop voting with same-day registration, and a 25-day regular registration deadline. It closes on how to get involved. Cited to North Carolina's own official sources (ncleg.gov, ncsbe.gov, sosnc.gov, nccourts.gov). Because state facts vary and change, the course flags the photo-ID litigation timeline and the absentee/early-voting deadlines, and points you to ncsbe.gov for current dates rather than asserting fixed rules.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Ohio Civics: How Your State Government Works

A practical, non-partisan guide to how the state of Ohio governs itself, and how you take part where you live. You'll learn Ohio's 1851 constitution and its unusually STRONG direct democracy (the initiative and referendum Ohioans have held since 1912, letting citizens amend the constitution or make law by petition, with a citizen constitutional amendment still passing on a SIMPLE majority after voters rejected a 2023 attempt to raise the bar to 60%); the three branches, including a plural executive (a Governor and separately-elected Lieutenant Governor who run as a joint ticket, plus a separately-elected Attorney General, Secretary of State, Auditor, and Treasurer) and a 99-member House and 33-member Senate; how a bill becomes an Ohio law, including Ohio's unusual THREE-FIFTHS veto override (not two-thirds); Ohio's ELECTED judges (partisan primaries, and, since 2022, party labels on the general-election ballot too); local government across Ohio's 88 counties, home-rule cities and villages, active townships, and special districts; and Ohio's elections rules: photo voter ID (since 2023), no-excuse early and absentee voting, and the citizen initiative/referendum process. It closes on how to get involved where you live. Cited to Ohio's own official sources (the Ohio Constitution/Revised Code, the Ohio General Assembly, ohiosos.gov, and the Ohio judicial branch). Because state facts vary and change, the course flags time-sensitive items (signature thresholds tied to the last governor's race, the 2023 photo-ID law, the 2021 judicial-ballot change, and the failed 2023 supermajority proposal) and points you to Ohio's own sources to confirm the current rule.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Pennsylvania Civics: How Your State Government Works

A practical, non-partisan guide to how the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania governs itself, and how you take part where you live. You'll learn Pennsylvania's current 1968 constitution and its unusual amendment path (a proposed amendment must pass the General Assembly in TWO consecutive sessions and then be approved by the voters, and Pennsylvania has NO citizen initiative, so only the legislature can start the process); the three state branches, including a partly-plural executive (the Governor and Lieutenant Governor run as a JOINT TICKET in the general election, while the Attorney General, Auditor General, and Treasurer are each elected separately); the General Assembly (a 203-member House and a 50-member Senate, the largest full-time state legislature in the nation); and a court system whose appellate judges (Supreme, Superior, and Commonwealth courts) are ELECTED in partisan races to 10-year terms and then face nonpartisan yes/no RETENTION votes. You'll learn how a bill becomes a Pennsylvania law (including the Governor's line-item veto on appropriations and the two-thirds override), and Pennsylvania's local government (67 counties; home-rule charters; and a full set of active municipalities: cities, boroughs, and townships of the first and second class; Pennsylvania does NOT abolish townships). Finally you'll learn Pennsylvania's distinctive elections rules (no-excuse mail-in voting since Act 77 of 2019, voter ID for first-time voters, closed primaries, and no citizen initiative) before a lesson on how to get involved. Cited to Pennsylvania's own official sources (legis.state.pa.us, pa.gov/vote, pacourts.us, dced.pa.gov). Because state facts vary and change, the course flags time-sensitive and litigated items (like the ongoing court fights over mail-in voting and voter ID) and points you to Pennsylvania's own sources to confirm the current rule.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

The Middle Layer: States, Provinces, and Regions

The course about the level of government between the nation and the locality: the US state, the German Land, the Canadian province, the Spanish autonomous community, and the devolved nations of the United Kingdom. It is course 4 of the path whose method course, Who Has the Power to Do This?, already taught the four questions and the vertical stack, and it sits directly above course 5, The Local Layer. Its one load-bearing idea is the difference between federalism and devolution, taught as entrenched versus delegated. A United States state is a co-sovereign: its existence and its equal representation in the Senate are bolted into the Constitution, and the federal government cannot abolish it. Scotland's powers, by contrast, come from the Scotland Act 1998, an ordinary Act of the Westminster Parliament that, under the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, Parliament could in principle repeal. That distinction, whether a middle-layer government holds its power by constitutional entitlement or by a statute the center can rewrite, is the whole lesson. You will learn the US reserved powers and the anti-commandeering doctrine, why a state cannot be abolished, and interstate compacts; then Germany's Laender and the Bundesrat, Canada's provinces under the Constitution Acts of 1867 and 1982, and Spain's contested estado autonomico; then the United Kingdom's asymmetric devolution and the sovereignty question at its heart. It closes with a map of federal, devolved, and unitary systems and a capstone: classify a real subnational government as entrenched-federal or devolved, and defend it from the primary documents. This course teaches how to read authority. It is not legal advice.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

The US Forms: Sole Prop to Corporation

A cited, high-school-and-up survey of the US business forms, and the direct sequel to 'What a Business Entity Actually Is.' It is not legal or tax advice, and it says so throughout: it teaches you what to ASK a lawyer or accountant, not the answer for your situation. Course 1 gave you the method, that any entity is a bundle of FOUR decisions (who pays the debts, who pays the tax, who owns it and how ownership moves, and who decides). This course applies that method across the actual US menu: the sole proprietorship and general partnership you can fall into without filing, the limited partnership and the LLP that add a liability wall, the LLC that became the modern default, the C-corporation built to raise money, and the nonprofits, where 501(c)(3), (c)(4) and (c)(6) are three different deals with three different rules on donations and politics. Two ideas get a full lesson each because they are the most misunderstood in the subject. First, the S-corp is a TAX ELECTION, not an entity type: it changes only how a business is taxed and leaves liability, ownership and governance to the entity underneath it. Second, a benefit corporation (a legal form a state recognises) is not the same thing as a Certified B Corp (a private certification granted by the nonprofit B Lab), two different things that most content blurs. The organizing insight is that a real menu mixes three kinds of thing, an entity, a tax status, and a private certification, and telling them apart is most of the skill. The capstone asks you to match a real scenario to a form and defend it against the four decisions, and against a specific alternative you rejected.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Tribal Nations and Indigenous Governance

The course that develops the one correction most civics teaching gets wrong: a tribal nation is not a rung on the federal, state, and local ladder at all. It is a separate sovereign, and its authority is pre-existing and inherent, older than the United States, not delegated down a stack the way a city's power is delegated from a state. Course 1 of this path, Who Has the Power to Do This?, introduced that idea in a single section; this course earns it in full, and with the care such content requires. You will learn where tribal sovereignty comes from and why the Marshall Court called the nations domestic dependent nations; why treaties rank as supreme law under the Supremacy Clause and how courts read them; how nations govern today, the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 and its model constitutions set against traditional and customary governance, with the Haudenosaunee Confederacy as a named living case; and the hard legal edges, Public Law 280, McGirt v. Oklahoma, and Alaska Native corporations, which are corporations rather than reservations and are the sharpest crossover between this path and the business-forms path. This course leads with nations' own words and Indigenous scholarship, treats the 574 federally recognized tribes as 574 distinct governments, and stops deliberately short of any nation's ceremonies or restricted internal detail, because that is not the course's to give. It teaches how to read authority. It is not legal advice.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Africa Before Colonization: The Documented Record

In 1830s Berlin, Hegel told his students that Africa was "no historical part of the World." In 1963, on British television, an Oxford professor said African history was "largely darkness." This course opens with those claims in the deniers' own words, then spends seven sections walking the documented record that refutes them: the kings of Kush who ruled Egypt as its 25th Dynasty; Aksum minting its own gold coins and adopting Christianity a generation before Rome made it official; the empires of Ghana, Mali, and Songhai on the gold roads, and the book culture of Timbuktu; the drystone city of Great Zimbabwe, and the documented campaign by a settler state to censor who built it; the Swahili trading coast Ibn Battuta called one of the most beautiful in the world; the Benin bronzes and the 1897 British looting; Ethiopia from the rock churches of Lalibela to the battlefield of Adwa. It is honest where honesty is uncomfortable: African states participated in slavery and the slave trades, and the course teaches that record plainly, because omitting it is its own distortion. It is equally honest about the opposite trap: romantic myth (a war-free golden age, invented net-worth figures for Mansa Musa) is as useless as the erasure, and the course flags every shaky claim as contested or estimated rather than asserting it. The last sections teach the transferable skill: HOW historians know, from archaeology, manuscripts, Arabic travelers in scholarly translation, and oral tradition, each with its strengths and limits. Cited throughout to the UNESCO General History of Africa, working Africanists (Thornton, Ehret, Gomez, Vansina, Hunwick), the Levtzion & Hopkins Corpus, museum records, and UNESCO World Heritage documentation. Every claim names a region, a people, and a period. Nothing here is "Africa did X."

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Asia Before European Colonization: The Center of Gravity

For most of recorded history, the center of the world economy was not in Europe. It was in Asia, and this course shows you the map. In eleven survey lessons plus an honest-record section, you will meet the Indus cities and the script nobody has ever read; Ashoka, the emperor who published his conscience on rocks; the Gupta mathematicians whose place-value numerals and zero became the digits you use every day; the Mughals, Central Asian outsiders who ruled India two centuries before the British did; Han, Tang, and Song China, where printing, paper money, the magnetic compass, and gunpowder were in use while Paris was a muddy town; Heian Japan and the shogunates; Korea, which printed with movable metal type before Gutenberg was born; Angkor, the largest preindustrial city footprint archaeologists have mapped; and the maritime empires of Srivijaya and Majapahit that most world-history courses skip entirely. Between them ran the connective tissue: the Silk Roads by land and sea, the translation movement of the Islamic Golden Age, and the Mongol Empire, taught as neither pure destroyer nor pure connector, because the record shows both. The course's central claim is cited, not asserted: economic historians' reconstructions (Maddison, 2007; taught with their caveats) put China and India together at roughly half of world output as late as 1820, and the scholarly fight over when and why 'the West' pulled ahead (Pomeranz, 2000, versus Broadberry and colleagues, 2018) is presented as the live debate it is. It is honest where honesty is uncomfortable: caste, hereditary slavery, and conquest were Asian realities long before any European ship arrived, and 'colonization' was not a European invention, only a European escalation. Every claim names a civilization, a period, and a region. Nothing here is 'Asia did X.'

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Baltimore: The Whole Chain

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on one American city that holds every link of the housing-segregation chain within its own limits: racial zoning, restrictive covenants, redlining, and a highway driven through the middle of a Black neighborhood and then abandoned. Baltimore is uniquely useful because you do not have to leave town to see the whole sequence. Its two prerequisites, The Green Book: How to Read a Route and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It, teach the method and the idea of an instrument, a specific legal power exercised by a specific body under a specific statute leaving a specific document. This course lines up four such instruments as one lineage aimed at one end, and then does the harder thing: it tests whether the sequence is really as clean as it sounds. It is not. The ordinance was a chain of four laws, not one. The covenants ran alongside the zoning rather than after it. The redlining map's direct causal role is disputed by the historians who have read the lending records. Teaching that untidiness is the point, because a chain you can check is worth more than a story you cannot. You will read the ordinance, the covenant language, the map and the highway plan, walk the unfinished trench as an unusually legible absence, find the plan being written for that ground right now, look up a real Baltimore parcel in the state's own records, and write a piece of grounded nonfiction about one block. A 360 tour of the corridor is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Brazil: State-Chartered Unions, a Union-Made President, and the 2017 Rupture

The country course built around a controlled experiment nobody could have designed: what happens to unions that were funded by the state, when the state stops funding them? Brazil answers it. In 1943, Getúlio Vargas's CLT wrote corporatism directly into law, one state-chartered union per category per territory, financed by a compulsory union tax deducted from every worker, member or not. That machinery organized labor and controlled it at once, and it survived democracy, dictatorship, and redemocratization, until the ABC metalworkers' strikes of 1978-80 produced a new unionism, a new federation (CUT), a new party (PT), and, eventually, a president. Then Law 13.467 of 2017 abolished the compulsory tax, and union revenue collapsed by more than 90% within two years, the course teaches the documented figures, year by year, source by source. It also teaches who the CLT never reached: the roughly four in ten Brazilian workers in informality (IBGE), the app drivers whose employment status Brazil's Supreme Court had not resolved as of July 2026, and the workers rescued from trabalho análogo à escravidão, slavery-like labor, by a mobile inspection system and a 'dirty list' that names employers publicly. Neutral and dated on live politics; every figure carries its year and source. Cited to the CLT, the 1988 Constitution, IBGE, the ILO, the STF's published decisions, and Brazil's Ministry of Labor.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Chile: A Labor System Designed to Be Weak

Every other course in the Workers' Rights track shows you a labor system that evolved, pushed and pulled into shape over a century of strikes, statutes, and settlements. Chile shows you one that was designed. In 1979, under a military dictatorship, a 30-year-old economist named José Piñera wrote a labor code with a stated goal, published a book defending it, and signed his work, bargaining confined by law to the single firm, strikes that employers could wait out or replace their way through, union pluralism used to fragment rather than to free. This course reads that design the way an engineer reads a blueprint. You will see what stood before it: the strongest labor movement in Latin America, a third of wage earners unionised by 1973, and how it was destroyed after the coup, told soberly and cited carefully. You will hear the designers' case in their own words, steelmanned honestly before it is measured against the record. You will follow the design through the return to democracy, why elected governments reformed it only at the margins for a quarter century, what the 2016 reform (Ley 20.940) finally changed, and what it deliberately did not, and you will read the result in today's numbers: union density around 16% and bargaining coverage around 19% (2023, OECD/AIAS), among the lowest in the OECD, in a system the OECD itself describes as atomised. Then the comparison the whole track has been building toward: Chile against Sweden and Denmark, two systems with the same surface, no sectoral bargaining written into statute, for exactly opposite reasons. One is silent because unions are strong enough not to need it. One is silent because its authors wanted them weak. This is the recommended final country course in the track, because its closing assignment is the point of the whole track: go re-read your own country's labor law, and ask who designed it, and what they wanted. Cited to OECD/AIAS, the Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional, the Dirección del Trabajo, Memoria Chilena, Servel, and the designers' own published defense. Take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

How the Tools Traveled

The capstone of the route series, and the course that turns a shelf of city courses into a curriculum with a thesis. Each city course in this series documented a decision: a blight designation in Indianapolis, a Supreme Court opinion out of Southwest Washington, a school district line in Detroit and Indianapolis, a racial zoning ordinance in Baltimore, a public-private partnership in Pittsburgh, a closed Army post in Lawrence, Indiana. Told separately they look like local misfortunes. They were not. They were a shared toolkit, largely federal, applied locally, and this course teaches the transmission rather than the tools. You will start with a taxonomy of connection, ranked from source and use at the strongest to thematic rhyme at the weakest, and with the rule that governs the rest of the course: a shared pattern is a rhyme, and only a documented line, a citation, a copied plan, a named person or a funding stream, is a connection. Then you will read the federal upstream in its own words: the Housing Acts of 1949 and 1954, the Federal Housing Administration's Underwriting Manual, and the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, which was formally the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways and is the bridge between the war material and the city material. Then you will work the flagship connection all the way through, Berman v. Parker out of Southwest Washington, and watch it fail the chronology test in its strong form and survive in a weaker and truer one. Then you will test three more lines and one whole category the course could not close, without re-inflating a single claim a sibling course weakened. Fort Harrison shows the same federal upstream acting through a different mechanism, as landowner and employer rather than funder. The course ends where an honest one has to end, with what none of this proves, and with a drill and an assignment that make you test a connection of your own. Prerequisites: The Green Book: How to Read a Route, plus at least two city courses, of which Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It and Washington, DC: Where the Instrument Was Blessed are the two ends of the connection worked here.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

India: When Most Workers Have No Employer

Every tool in the anchor course, the election, the contract, the grievance procedure, the duty to bargain, assumes one thing so basic it is never said out loud: that a worker is an employee, and an employee has an employer. India is where that assumption breaks. About 90% of Indian workers are in informal employment (India Employment Report 2024, ILO and the Institute for Human Development, built on the government's own Periodic Labour Force Survey): no written contract, no social security, often no identifiable employer at all. This course teaches what that number means and where it comes from; the full legal machine India built on paper (a union with seven members, a constitution that guarantees association, and a Supreme Court that found no fundamental right to strike); union federations that each belong to a political party, a third politics-and-labor entanglement to set against Poland and China; SEWA, the Self-Employed Women's Association, which since 1972 has organized millions of women who have no employer to bargain with, the one institutional invention in this track built for exactly that; the 2019-2020 Labour Codes that folded 29 laws into four and then waited five years to come into force (taught dated, because the states are still writing their rules); the first legal recognition of gig and platform workers anywhere in this track; and the honest part, caste and labor, the sewer deaths a ministry reported to Parliament in the same breath as 'no manual scavenging,' and child labor's real progress and real limits. Cited to the ILO, the Periodic Labour Force Survey, the Codes' own text, parliamentary answers, and SEWA's own record. A country course in the Workers' Rights track, take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Mudsock: How a Rivalry Marks a Boundary

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Fishers and Hamilton County, Indiana, built around one civic question: how does a suburb form, and who pays for what. This is the counterweight to Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It. That course follows a Black business corridor that was cleared; this one follows the ground that grew, twenty miles northeast, over the same decades, under a different set of legal instruments. You will learn where the name Mudsock comes from and what a nickname is and is not evidence of, read a county's growth out of the decennial census instead of out of a slogan, look at the subdivision and the campus high school as building types with assumptions built into them, and then spend the longest section of the course on the instruments themselves: incorporation, annexation and the remonstrance waiver almost nobody reads, the school district line drawn under Indiana's 1959 School Reorganization Act, and the property tax caps that decide when a wealthy district still has to ask its voters for money. You will test the claim in this course's own title against the record and watch part of it fail, look up a real parcel and a real taxing district in Indiana's public finance database, find the school referendum currently on the November 2026 ballot, and write a piece of grounded nonfiction about one street or one boundary. A virtual tour of the Mudsock rivalry and its ground is planned and will be added to the Now section when its embed URL exists.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Philadelphia: The University and the Block

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on the Black Bottom in West Philadelphia: the working-class Black neighborhood that was certified as blighted and cleared in the 1960s so that a consortium of universities led by the University of Pennsylvania could build the University City Science Center, the nation's first urban research park. This is the second metro-spine course after the Indianapolis pilot, and it exists to test one argument: that the Black Bottom is Indiana Avenue's closest twin anywhere, because the instrument that did the work at both campuses is the same, a university assembling land through a public redevelopment authority under a 1945 state blight statute. The prerequisite courses teach the method and the model: The Green Book: How to Read a Route teaches you to read a record and research an address forward, and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It found that a university plus a redevelopment authority, not the highway, cleared that corridor. This course draws the comparison explicitly and stays precise about what is parallel and what is merely similar. You will learn the certification instrument under Pennsylvania's Urban Redevelopment Law, eminent domain and federal urban-renewal financing, and the West Philadelphia Corporation as the university's land-assembly surrogate; you will handle, with care and by way of the official commission report, a second and very different West Philadelphia decision, the MOVE bombing of 1985; you will look up a real parcel in the city's own Atlas, find the live civics of Penn's payments to the schools, and write a piece of grounded nonfiction. A 360 tour of the corridor is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Pittsburgh: Where the Playbook Was Written

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Pittsburgh's Hill District: the majority-Black neighborhood that Harlem Renaissance poet Claude McKay called the Crossroads of the World, home of the Pittsburgh Courier and the Crawford Grill and the Hill District of August Wilson's ten-play cycle, and the Lower Hill of it that was declared blighted and cleared in the 1950s for the Civic Arena. This is a sibling of the Indiana Avenue course, and it goes one step further: Indianapolis did not invent the instruments that emptied Indiana Avenue, and neither did Pittsburgh, but Pittsburgh assembled and showcased the public-private redevelopment machine early and visibly enough that the postwar Pittsburgh Renaissance became a national reference case. This course applies the prerequisite Green Book method to one neighborhood, teaches the actual tools of the decision (the state redevelopment law, the blight designation, eminent domain, the public-private partnership, and the export of the model), tests the course's own headline claim against the record and reports where it weakens, looks at the arena as architecture and at the rare double absence left when that arena was itself demolished around 2011 to 2012, sends the learner to Allegheny County's own parcel records and to Pittsburgh's unfinished comprehensive plan, and ends in an August Wilson writing assignment. A 360 tour of the Lower Hill is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Pre-Columbian Mesoamerica: Cities, Calendars, and the People Who Are Still Here

Before any European ship reached the Americas, the land between central Mexico and Costa Rica held some of the largest cities on Earth, a fully developed writing system, a positional number system with zero, calendars accurate enough to track Venus for centuries, and farms engineered on lakes and in rainforests. This course walks that record: the Olmec of the Gulf lowlands and the live scholarly debate about what they were to everyone else; Teotihuacan, a metropolis of perhaps 100,000 whose builders' very language is unknown, the best humility lesson in archaeology; the Maya city-states, their script and Long Count calendar, the real (and really debated) Classic collapse, and the roughly seven million Maya alive right now, because they did not vanish; the Mexica (Aztec) island capital of Tenochtitlan, its chinampa farms and tribute empire, and an honest accounting of human sacrifice, real, excavated, and routinely exaggerated by sources with motives; the Zapotec, Mixtec, and the Purepecha empire that stopped the Aztecs cold; Central America beyond Mexico, from the buried village of Joya de Ceren to the stone spheres of the Diquis delta; and the conquest told without myths, smallpox and steel, yes, but also tens of thousands of Indigenous allies who were fighting their own war, and a 'conquest' that did not reach the last independent Maya kingdom until 1697. The last section teaches the transferable skill: HOW we know, a bishop's book-burning at Mani in 1562 and the four codices that survived it, the Cold War decipherment that let the Maya speak in their own words, and the LiDAR surveys that found tens of thousands of structures under the Peten canopy in a single campaign. Numbers are taught as ranges, contested claims are labeled contested with a name on each side, and nothing here is 'mysterious ancient aliens', the mystery-mongering is itself one of the myths this course dismantles. Cited throughout to working Mesoamericanists (Coe, Houston, Miller, Martin, Restall, Cowgill, Smith), INAH excavation reporting, the Popol Vuh and Florentine Codex in scholarly translation, and UNESCO World Heritage documentation.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Seattle: The Modern Bookend

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Seattle: who could live where, the neighborhoods that racial restriction built, and the two Supreme Court opinions that bracket a single argument thirty-three years apart. The building block is a boundary you cannot photograph. You will read Seattle out of a rare searchable primary archive, the University of Washington's Racial Restrictive Covenants Project, which has documented tens of thousands of deeds that once barred nonwhite families from most of the city. You will sit with the Central District, the corridor where a constrained Black Seattle built a full community, and with Bainbridge Island, the place the first forced removal of Japanese Americans began in 1942, now marked by a memorial the community keeps. Then you will read two opinions directly. Milliken v. Bradley (1974) stopped a court-ordered desegregation remedy at the school district line: it limited what a court could compel. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007) stopped a district that had never been segregated by law from using race in school assignment: it limited what a district could choose to do voluntarily. You will quote the operative language of both, including the plurality and concurrence split in Parents Involved that decides what the case actually held, correct what it is popularly said to have held, look up a real covenant or parcel in the public records, learn how Seattle assigns students today, and write one grounded, checkable piece. Prerequisites: The Green Book: How to Read a Route (the method) and The Gym and the Color Line (the district-line course this one bookends). A 360 tour of the ground is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

South Africa: The Union That Helped End Apartheid, Then Joined the Government

Apartheid South Africa put Black workers outside labor law by name: the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924 wrote them out of the word "employee," a 1953 statute criminalised their strikes, and "job reservation" saved the best jobs for white workers by law, the bluntest version of the exclusion move this track finds in country after country. This course follows what the excluded built anyway: the leaderless Durban strikes of 1973, the shop-steward unions that became COSATU in 1985 (about 460,000 members at launch, South African History Online), the three-week miners' strike of 1987, and the Tripartite Alliance with the ANC that helped end apartheid in 1994. Then it follows the harder story after the victory. The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 is among the most worker-friendly statutes anywhere, written partly by the unionists who had just won, and yet official unemployment stands at 32.9% (Q1 2025, Stats SA), labor broking moves workers outside the paper protections, and on 16 August 2012 police of the democratic state shot dead 34 striking miners at Marikana. That day is taught soberly, from the published findings of the Farlam Commission, what it found, what it did not find, and what is still unresolved, dated and left open. The course ends with the fracture the alliance produced, NUMSA expelled in 2014, the rival SAFTU federation founded in 2017, and with a question borrowed from this track's Poland course, offered and not answered: can a union movement win the state without losing the workplace? Cited to South African History Online, the statutes themselves, Stats SA, the ILO and the Marikana Commission report. A country course in the Workers' Rights track, take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

South Korea: Democracy, the Chaebol, and the Lawsuit as a Weapon

South Korea compresses a century of labor history into four decades. Under Park Chung-hee's developmental dictatorship, cheap and tightly controlled labor was not a side effect of the economic miracle, it was the policy, and the teenage women sewing in the Peace Market's attic workshops paid for it. On 13 November 1970 a 22-year-old tailor named Jeon Tae-il burned himself alive beside a copy of the Labor Standards Act the state refused to enforce; his reported last words, "We are not machines", became the founding sentence of the modern Korean labor movement, and his mother Lee So-sun spent the next four decades building the unions her son died asking for. In the summer of 1987, as the dictatorship cracked, more than three thousand strikes erupted in three months, the Great Workers' Struggle, and Korean workers won their unions and their democracy in the same season. Then the honest part: a wealthy OECD democracy that ratified the ILO's freedom-of-association conventions only in 2021; a workforce where 38.2% of wage workers are 'non-regular' (August 2025, Statistics Korea) and stand outside most of what the unions won; union density of about 13% (2022, Ministry of Employment and Labor) with bargaining coverage barely higher, because bargaining stops at the company gate; and a repression mechanism students will not have seen anywhere else in this track, civil damages suits and provisional seizure of wages and homes brought against individual strikers, which can financially destroy a worker without ever jailing one. The decade-long fight over that mechanism, the 'yellow envelope law,' is taught dated and unresolved. A country course in the Workers' Rights track, take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Sweden & Denmark: The Wage Floor That Isn't a Law

In Sweden and Denmark there is almost no statutory national minimum wage, and that is not an oversight. It is the design. The wage floor is a contract, negotiated industry by industry between unions and employers, and the state deliberately stays out. For a student raised on "the government sets the floor," this is the most disorienting fact in the whole Workers' Rights track, and this course is built around it. You will learn the plumbing that makes it work: the Ghent system, in which unemployment insurance is run through union-linked funds, which pushes union membership toward two-thirds of the workforce, and the natural experiment that proves it, because Norway, a Nordic country WITHOUT Ghent, sits around half. You will see the strongest evidence for that mechanism anywhere: when Sweden raised its unemployment-fund fees in 2007, density fell, fast. You will meet the two agreements by which the state stepped back on purpose, Saltsjöbaden (Sweden, 1938) and the September Compromise (Denmark, 1899), and the Danish bargain called flexicurity: easy to fire, well cushioned if you are, and actively helped back to work, taught as a trade rather than a fairy tale, and honestly, as a trade under strain. You will learn the sharpest single comparison in the track: sympathy strikes, which US law bans, are legal here, and you will watch the model defend itself in real time in the still-unresolved 2023 Tesla dispute in Sweden. Then the honest limits: density is falling, migrant and platform workers sit outside the agreements, and (the lesson nobody expects) the Nordic unions themselves fought an EU law that would have guaranteed a minimum wage, because a legal floor would undercut the thing they built. Cited to OECD/AIAS, ETUI, Eurofound, the national confederations, and the EU directive itself. A country course in the Workers' Rights track, take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

The Gym and the Color Line

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Indianapolis high school gymnasiums and football fields, and on the one civic instrument that decides who plays in them: the school district line. Indiana builds the largest high school gyms in the United States, and it built Crispus Attucks High School in 1927 as the segregated Black high school for a city whose school board had been asked to build it. Attucks was kept out of the state tournament until 1942, sat on 8.4 acres when the state's own formula asked for more than three times that, and then won the state championship in 1955, 1956 and 1959. The building type is the hook. The boundary is the lesson. You will read three court opinions directly, United States v. Board of School Commissioners (1971 and 1974) and Milliken v. Bradley (1974), and watch a federal judge find that more than ninety percent of about 350 attendance-zone changes promoted segregation, watch the 1969 Unigov statute expand a city's limits while expressly leaving its school district where it was, and watch the Supreme Court turn the district line into a wall the remedy could not cross. Then you will test that argument against a chronology, correct two claims this course could not verify, look up a real school's district and its boundary in the federal and state records, and write about one gym. Prerequisites: The Green Book: How to Read a Route (the method) and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It (course 1, the same metro). A 360 tour of the gyms and fields is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

The President's House

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on the Benjamin Harrison house at 1230 North Delaware Street in Indianapolis, and on the question a president's house is the right place to ask: what could a presidency do about voting rights, and what happened when it tried? This is course 5 of the Indianapolis cluster and its civics anchor, and it is the one course in the series whose subject is a person with power rather than a place that lost it. Benjamin Harrison, the 23rd president, lived and died in this house. During his single term a bill to put federal supervisors on congressional elections passed the House, was filibustered in a Senate that had no way to end a filibuster, and was set aside by one vote. You will read the bill, read Harrison's own messages, watch a bill die by the ordinary machinery rather than by a losing vote, and then test the flattering version of the story against the parts of his record that do not fit it, including the Geary Act and Wounded Knee. You will read the house itself as architecture and as a museum, and learn the difference between what a building is and what a preserved building has been chosen to show. Finally you will connect a failed federal remedy in 1891 to a local boundary decision in this same city in 1970, because national power and local boundaries are two levers on the same question. A 360 tour of the site is planned and will be added to the Now section when its embed URL exists. The prerequisite course, The Green Book: How to Read a Route, teaches the research method this course applies.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

The Schoolhouse Network

A cited, high-school-and-up course on the Rosenwald school building program: roughly five thousand school buildings raised across the segregated South in the early twentieth century, on a matching model that combined a Chicago philanthropist's grant, public tax money, and cash, land and labor raised by Black communities themselves. It is the counterpart to The Gym and the Color Line, which teaches what a boundary did to schooling; this course teaches what communities built, and it runs on one hard rule stated in its first lesson: never use a positive to soften a negative. A school raised by people who were simultaneously being taxed for schools their children could not attend is not a happy ending, and this course does not offer it as one. The claim is co-occurrence, not balance. You will verify the famous numbers and find that the sources disagree about the building count, the date range and even the number of students served, then learn why they disagree. You will read the matching model as a four-column budget and work out what share the communities actually paid, which is the figure that complicates the way this story is usually told. You will read two real school cards out of the Julius Rosenwald Fund archive at Fisk University. You will learn why the buildings look the way they do, down to the orientation, the window banks and the two permitted interior paint schemes, because the light was the design problem. You will meet the people who raised the money and taught in the rooms. Then you will hold the program's calendar against the rest of the record for the same years, find a surviving school near you in the federal and state registers, and write a piece of grounded nonfiction about one building and the budget line that raised it. Prerequisite: The Green Book: How to Read a Route, which teaches the method this course applies. A 360 tour of a restored schoolhouse is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Training the Colonizer: The Knowledge That Was Taken

When Europeans built plantation economies in the Americas, they grew crops they did not know how to grow, on land they did not know how to work, using techniques they did not invent. This course walks the documented record of what enslaved and colonized people taught the people who enslaved them: West African rice-growers whose expertise fed the Carolina Lowcountry; the enslaved man Onesimus, who taught Cotton Mather the African practice of smallpox inoculation before the 1721 Boston epidemic; the herders, indigo-makers, blacksmiths, bridge-builders, boat-pilots, and cooks whose skill built colonial wealth. It is careful where the record is careful. The famous Black Rice thesis (Judith Carney, 2001) is taught as a thesis, alongside the scholars who challenged it (Eltis, Morgan, and Richardson, 2007) and those who answered them, with no winner declared, because learning to hold a contested claim honestly is one of the skills this course is really teaching. It refuses the two opposite lies: the old erasure that says Europeans built everything, and the romantic overcorrection that says Africans invented everything without a citation. And it never lets the story go soft: this knowledge was coerced, uncredited, and uncompensated. Being the person who knew how to grow the rice did not make you free. Cited throughout to working historians (Carney, Wood, Littlefield, Hawthorne, Hall, Dawson, Feeser, Schiebinger) and the Mather and Boylston primary record. For high school students.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Two Racetracks

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on the two racetracks of Indianapolis and the civic question that runs between them: who is admitted to a sport, and what gets built alongside when they are not? Five miles apart sit a 2.5-mile oval that opened in 1909, was paved with 3.2 million bricks, became a National Historic Landmark in 1987 and still runs the race it was built for, and a one-mile dirt oval that opened with the state fairgrounds in 1892, held the largest annually staged Black sporting event in America between 1924 and 1936, and was converted in 2019 to a crushed-limestone harness training surface and parking. Between 1924 and 1936 the Colored Speedway Association ran the Gold and Glory Sweepstakes on that dirt mile, because the premier race would not admit Black drivers; the first Black driver started the Indianapolis 500 in 1991, eighty years and seventy-five runnings after the first. This course does not repeat the story it inherited. It goes looking for the written rule that is supposed to sit under it, reports that it could not find one, and teaches the far more useful thing it found instead: how a license, an entry form, a club membership and a private gate can do the work of a rule while leaving almost no record. You will learn what an oval does to a farm and a town, why the Town of Speedway is one of the four places the 1970 Unigov consolidation left alone, who governs each of these two grounds today (one is private property, one is a state body corporate and politic, one is a town with its own redevelopment commission chartered to eliminate blight), test a claim against the record and watch part of it fail, look up a real parcel and a real public meeting, and write one piece of grounded nonfiction. Prerequisites: The Green Book: How to Read a Route (the method) and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It (course 1, the same metro and the same instruments). A 360 tour of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway is planned and will be added to the Now section when its embed URL exists.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Washington, DC: Where the Instrument Was Blessed

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Southwest Washington, DC, and Berman v. Parker (1954), the Supreme Court decision that made clearing land as "blighted" constitutionally safe across the whole country. The pilot course in this series found that a blight designation and land assembly, not the highway, actually cleared Indiana Avenue in Indianapolis. This is the course where that tool was authorised. Its prerequisites, The Green Book: How to Read a Route and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It, teach a method and apply it to one corridor; this course reads the opinion that licensed the method, quotes its operative language accurately, and is honest about what it did and did not hold, including that the plaintiff was a department store owner rather than a displaced resident. You will walk Southwest DC before clearance and read the surveys the Court relied on, see the modernist superblocks that replaced a working neighborhood, learn the instruments beat by beat, trace the holding forward to Kelo and back to Indiana Avenue while testing that link against a chronology, meet the freeway revolt that is one of the few victories in this series, learn why the people whose homes were cleared could not vote for the Congress that governed them, look up a real DC parcel, and write grounded nonfiction about one block. A 360 tour of the waterfront is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon