Skip to content

Courses

← Home

56 courses in Culture & History

🕒 Coming soon
See the whole path

CREDIT-02Credit: Who Gets Named

Who Signs the Print

A fine art print is made by at least two people: the artist who makes the image, and the master printer who makes the edition. Only one of them signs it. That is not a rule about race, and getting that right is the whole point of this course, because the convention applies to every master printer who has ever worked, which means the medium itself manufactures a category of expertise the public cannot see. The interesting question is who ends up in that category, and what they build once they are there. This course teaches the convention end to end: what a pencil signature actually certifies (approval, not authorship, and it dates only from the second half of the nineteenth century), where the printer's credit really lives (an embossed chop that carries no name, and a documentation sheet the public never reads), and what a printer owns instead of a signature (the bon a tirer, the proof the whole edition must match). Then it follows Robert Blackburn, hired in 1957 as the first master printer at Universal Limited Art Editions, who printed its first seventy-nine editions, all of which carry other artists' signatures, and who answered the convention by building an open workshop rather than by arguing with it. Elizabeth Catlett answered it with a collective, Margaret Taylor-Burroughs with a museum, AfriCOBRA with a cheap and portable medium, Charles White with a classroom, and Emma Amos with a print portfolio that got her into a room she was the only woman in. The shape transfers: session musicians, ghostwriters, film colourists, translators and test kitchens are governed by the same three conditions, and the course ends by teaching you to spot them, and by showing two credit conventions that were actually corrected.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon
See the whole path

CREDIT-03Credit: Who Gets Named

The Name on the Door

A building is credited to a firm, and a firm is named after whoever owns it. That one sentence explains more about architectural credit than any story about a stolen design, because it means the public credit line for a building answers a legal and contractual question rather than the question readers think they are asking. This course teaches the convention end to end: what a credit line actually names, what a licensed architect's seal certifies and what it does not, and why the architect of record and the design architect are two different jobs that only sometimes belong to the same person. Then it adds the second gate. Architectural licensure began in Illinois in 1897 and spread state by state, and it is real public-safety regulation with a real body count behind it, but it is also a gate, and the education and paid-experience steps behind it ran through admissions offices and hiring decisions. Julian Abele is the case, and the popular version of him is wrong in specific and checkable ways. He was chief designer in Horace Trumbauer's office and took the firm over after Trumbauer died, but employees there did not sign, and when he applied to the American Institute of Architects in 1942 the only buildings he could list as his own were his sister's house and the Duke work. That single document is worth more than the myth ever was. The course also refuses the flattering errors: he was not a servant, he was not the sole architect of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and there is no record that he attended the Ecole des Beaux-Arts. Norma Merrick Sklarek, Beverly Loraine Greene, Georgia Louise Harris Brown, Paul Revere Williams and Robert R. Taylor carry the rest of the argument, and the course ends where credit conventions can actually be changed: a cornerstone recut to carry two names, an award rule that admits two people instead of one, and a ledger of what this course tested and refused to print.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon
See the whole path

CREDIT-WRI1Credit: Who Gets Named

Written by Himself

A byline is not a report of who wrote something. It is a term in an agreement, and the title page is where the agreement shows. Ghostwriting is the cleanest place in this catalog to see that, because the writer's name is missing by design and the writer was paid for exactly that: the absence is the deliverable, not a wrong done to anybody. So this course does not call ghostwriting theft, which would be wrong and correctable in public by anyone holding a publishing contract. It asks the harder question instead. Who ends up inside that contract, who ends up outside it, and what does a byline pay that a fee does not? The evidence is free, digitised and out of copyright, and the course reads it directly. Phillis Wheatley's 1773 Poems carries an attestation in its own front matter, signed by eighteen Boston men, certifying that a Black woman wrote her own poems: the credit document and the book are the same object. Frederick Douglass answered the same disbelief from the other direction, by putting the claim in his subtitle. Solomon Northup's book was edited by David Wilson, Omar ibn Said wrote his in Arabic in 1831, and Abby Fisher dictated hers because she could not write. Elizabeth Keckley took the byline and was punished for it, and was doubted anyway. And Harriet Jacobs is the model correction the whole series needs: her book was read as Lydia Maria Child's for roughly a century, and Jean Fagan Yellin restored it to Jacobs using Jacobs's own letters. Four of the strongest documents here are books by Black women whose authorship was disputed, which makes women the argument rather than an addendum. The course ends in the present tense, with the as-told-to trade, the collaborator credit ladder, and a deliberate refusal: where the record does not name the writer, this course does not guess.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon
See the whole path

CREDIT-REC1Credit: Who Gets Named

Who Made the Record: Photography, Custody, and the Credit Line

A photograph of a person looks like something that happened. It is something somebody did, and this course follows the paperwork that decision leaves behind: who commissioned the picture, who was paid, whose name went in the caption, who owned the plate afterwards, and who is allowed to say no. It is a credit course, not a craft course, and it teaches nobody to take a photograph. It runs from Frederick Douglass, who published a theory of the record before he sat for one, through Kodak's Shirley card, where a technical default stopped looking like a decision, to the 1850 daguerreotypes Louis Agassiz commissioned in South Carolina, a record made about seven enslaved people to argue something about them. It then reads three credit lines a learner can go and check today: an archive that names Ella Watson, a museum catalogue that grades its own certainty with the words attributed to, and an acquisition record that three published accounts date to three different years. It ends on two claims made on one archive, Carrie Mae Weems against Harvard in the 1990s and Tamara Lanier against Harvard from 2019, taught as the pair they are, with the legal posture kept intact rather than smoothed into a story about who won. Every contested claim here is taught as contested with the holders named, and where this course could not reach a source it says so instead of guessing.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon
See the whole path

CREDIT-CHO1Credit: Who Gets Named

Black creators in dance, and the copyright that would not hold them

Choreography was not a copyrightable category in the United States until 1 January 1978. Before that date a dance could be registered only if it passed as a dramatic composition, in Class D, which meant it had to tell a story or develop a character, and the rule came from a case a white dancer lost in 1892. After that date it could be registered only if it was fixed: written, notated or filmed. A dance that was danced and never written down was, in law, never a work at all. This course teaches that mechanism from the documents themselves, the 1909 Act, the Copyright Office's own Compendium, Circular 52, and the opinions in Horgan v. Macmillan and Hanagami v. Epic Games, and then reads the archive against it. You will open the Library of Congress finding aid for the Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater Collection to a box of contracts and read four Black choreographers' names on four folder headings, one of them with a royalties schedule laid in and one of them closed to researchers until the year 2100. You will compare the two folders that hold what survives of the choreography of Revelations with the two boxes that hold its choral scores. And you will price a Labanotation score, because a score is not only a record, it is a revenue instrument, and every choreographer who was never notated was excluded from it. Nothing here is asserted that was not read from a source. Where the popular story is wrong, including about Alvin Ailey and about Janet Collins, the correction is the lesson.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon
See the whole path

CREDIT-SCI1Credit: Who Gets Named

Esther Lederberg: The Technique, the Phage, and the Record

Esther Miriam Zimmer Lederberg developed replica plating, discovered bacteriophage lambda, and found the fertility factor that explained how bacteria mate. Molecular biology runs on all three. This course teaches the science first, in that order, because the alternative order is the problem: introduce her as somebody's wife and the work becomes the footnote, which is exactly the move the record shows being made about her for fifty years. Only after you can say what replica plating does and why a turbid plaque mattered does the course open the attribution question, and then it opens it with paperwork rather than outrage: the exact motivation of the 1958 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine and the exact shares, the Nobel Foundation's own 1958 biography of the laureate, which mentions her in a marriage sentence and gives her job title as research associate, and the author lines of the papers themselves, checked one by one against the journals' own records. It also teaches the limits. The Nobel statutes cap a prize at three people and that prize already had three names, so the honest question is about how credit was allocated across a career and a literature, not a verdict on a committee whose deliberations nobody can read. The frame is the Matilda effect, named by Margaret Rossiter in 1993 and measured across thirteen scientific societies in 2012. And because getting it wrong in her favour makes the true record easier to dismiss, the last lesson corrects the corrections.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Africa Before Colonization: The Documented Record

In 1830s Berlin, Hegel told his students that Africa was "no historical part of the World." In 1963, on British television, an Oxford professor said African history was "largely darkness." This course opens with those claims in the deniers' own words, then spends seven sections walking the documented record that refutes them: the kings of Kush who ruled Egypt as its 25th Dynasty; Aksum minting its own gold coins and adopting Christianity a generation before Rome made it official; the empires of Ghana, Mali, and Songhai on the gold roads, and the book culture of Timbuktu; the drystone city of Great Zimbabwe, and the documented campaign by a settler state to censor who built it; the Swahili trading coast Ibn Battuta called one of the most beautiful in the world; the Benin bronzes and the 1897 British looting; Ethiopia from the rock churches of Lalibela to the battlefield of Adwa. It is honest where honesty is uncomfortable: African states participated in slavery and the slave trades, and the course teaches that record plainly, because omitting it is its own distortion. It is equally honest about the opposite trap: romantic myth (a war-free golden age, invented net-worth figures for Mansa Musa) is as useless as the erasure, and the course flags every shaky claim as contested or estimated rather than asserting it. The last sections teach the transferable skill: HOW historians know, from archaeology, manuscripts, Arabic travelers in scholarly translation, and oral tradition, each with its strengths and limits. Cited throughout to the UNESCO General History of Africa, working Africanists (Thornton, Ehret, Gomez, Vansina, Hunwick), the Levtzion & Hopkins Corpus, museum records, and UNESCO World Heritage documentation. Every claim names a region, a people, and a period. Nothing here is "Africa did X."

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Asia Before European Colonization: The Center of Gravity

For most of recorded history, the center of the world economy was not in Europe. It was in Asia, and this course shows you the map. In eleven survey lessons plus an honest-record section, you will meet the Indus cities and the script nobody has ever read; Ashoka, the emperor who published his conscience on rocks; the Gupta mathematicians whose place-value numerals and zero became the digits you use every day; the Mughals, Central Asian outsiders who ruled India two centuries before the British did; Han, Tang, and Song China, where printing, paper money, the magnetic compass, and gunpowder were in use while Paris was a muddy town; Heian Japan and the shogunates; Korea, which printed with movable metal type before Gutenberg was born; Angkor, the largest preindustrial city footprint archaeologists have mapped; and the maritime empires of Srivijaya and Majapahit that most world-history courses skip entirely. Between them ran the connective tissue: the Silk Roads by land and sea, the translation movement of the Islamic Golden Age, and the Mongol Empire, taught as neither pure destroyer nor pure connector, because the record shows both. The course's central claim is cited, not asserted: economic historians' reconstructions (Maddison, 2007; taught with their caveats) put China and India together at roughly half of world output as late as 1820, and the scholarly fight over when and why 'the West' pulled ahead (Pomeranz, 2000, versus Broadberry and colleagues, 2018) is presented as the live debate it is. It is honest where honesty is uncomfortable: caste, hereditary slavery, and conquest were Asian realities long before any European ship arrived, and 'colonization' was not a European invention, only a European escalation. Every claim names a civilization, a period, and a region. Nothing here is 'Asia did X.'

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Baltimore: The Whole Chain

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on one American city that holds every link of the housing-segregation chain within its own limits: racial zoning, restrictive covenants, redlining, and a highway driven through the middle of a Black neighborhood and then abandoned. Baltimore is uniquely useful because you do not have to leave town to see the whole sequence. Its two prerequisites, The Green Book: How to Read a Route and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It, teach the method and the idea of an instrument, a specific legal power exercised by a specific body under a specific statute leaving a specific document. This course lines up four such instruments as one lineage aimed at one end, and then does the harder thing: it tests whether the sequence is really as clean as it sounds. It is not. The ordinance was a chain of four laws, not one. The covenants ran alongside the zoning rather than after it. The redlining map's direct causal role is disputed by the historians who have read the lending records. Teaching that untidiness is the point, because a chain you can check is worth more than a story you cannot. You will read the ordinance, the covenant language, the map and the highway plan, walk the unfinished trench as an unusually legible absence, find the plan being written for that ground right now, look up a real Baltimore parcel in the state's own records, and write a piece of grounded nonfiction about one block. A 360 tour of the corridor is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Brazil: State-Chartered Unions, a Union-Made President, and the 2017 Rupture

The country course built around a controlled experiment nobody could have designed: what happens to unions that were funded by the state, when the state stops funding them? Brazil answers it. In 1943, Getúlio Vargas's CLT wrote corporatism directly into law, one state-chartered union per category per territory, financed by a compulsory union tax deducted from every worker, member or not. That machinery organized labor and controlled it at once, and it survived democracy, dictatorship, and redemocratization, until the ABC metalworkers' strikes of 1978-80 produced a new unionism, a new federation (CUT), a new party (PT), and, eventually, a president. Then Law 13.467 of 2017 abolished the compulsory tax, and union revenue collapsed by more than 90% within two years, the course teaches the documented figures, year by year, source by source. It also teaches who the CLT never reached: the roughly four in ten Brazilian workers in informality (IBGE), the app drivers whose employment status Brazil's Supreme Court had not resolved as of July 2026, and the workers rescued from trabalho análogo à escravidão, slavery-like labor, by a mobile inspection system and a 'dirty list' that names employers publicly. Neutral and dated on live politics; every figure carries its year and source. Cited to the CLT, the 1988 Constitution, IBGE, the ILO, the STF's published decisions, and Brazil's Ministry of Labor.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Chile: A Labor System Designed to Be Weak

Every other course in the Workers' Rights track shows you a labor system that evolved, pushed and pulled into shape over a century of strikes, statutes, and settlements. Chile shows you one that was designed. In 1979, under a military dictatorship, a 30-year-old economist named José Piñera wrote a labor code with a stated goal, published a book defending it, and signed his work, bargaining confined by law to the single firm, strikes that employers could wait out or replace their way through, union pluralism used to fragment rather than to free. This course reads that design the way an engineer reads a blueprint. You will see what stood before it: the strongest labor movement in Latin America, a third of wage earners unionised by 1973, and how it was destroyed after the coup, told soberly and cited carefully. You will hear the designers' case in their own words, steelmanned honestly before it is measured against the record. You will follow the design through the return to democracy, why elected governments reformed it only at the margins for a quarter century, what the 2016 reform (Ley 20.940) finally changed, and what it deliberately did not, and you will read the result in today's numbers: union density around 16% and bargaining coverage around 19% (2023, OECD/AIAS), among the lowest in the OECD, in a system the OECD itself describes as atomised. Then the comparison the whole track has been building toward: Chile against Sweden and Denmark, two systems with the same surface, no sectoral bargaining written into statute, for exactly opposite reasons. One is silent because unions are strong enough not to need it. One is silent because its authors wanted them weak. This is the recommended final country course in the track, because its closing assignment is the point of the whole track: go re-read your own country's labor law, and ask who designed it, and what they wanted. Cited to OECD/AIAS, the Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional, the Dirección del Trabajo, Memoria Chilena, Servel, and the designers' own published defense. Take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

How the Tools Traveled

The capstone of the route series, and the course that turns a shelf of city courses into a curriculum with a thesis. Each city course in this series documented a decision: a blight designation in Indianapolis, a Supreme Court opinion out of Southwest Washington, a school district line in Detroit and Indianapolis, a racial zoning ordinance in Baltimore, a public-private partnership in Pittsburgh, a closed Army post in Lawrence, Indiana. Told separately they look like local misfortunes. They were not. They were a shared toolkit, largely federal, applied locally, and this course teaches the transmission rather than the tools. You will start with a taxonomy of connection, ranked from source and use at the strongest to thematic rhyme at the weakest, and with the rule that governs the rest of the course: a shared pattern is a rhyme, and only a documented line, a citation, a copied plan, a named person or a funding stream, is a connection. Then you will read the federal upstream in its own words: the Housing Acts of 1949 and 1954, the Federal Housing Administration's Underwriting Manual, and the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, which was formally the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways and is the bridge between the war material and the city material. Then you will work the flagship connection all the way through, Berman v. Parker out of Southwest Washington, and watch it fail the chronology test in its strong form and survive in a weaker and truer one. Then you will test three more lines and one whole category the course could not close, without re-inflating a single claim a sibling course weakened. Fort Harrison shows the same federal upstream acting through a different mechanism, as landowner and employer rather than funder. The course ends where an honest one has to end, with what none of this proves, and with a drill and an assignment that make you test a connection of your own. Prerequisites: The Green Book: How to Read a Route, plus at least two city courses, of which Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It and Washington, DC: Where the Instrument Was Blessed are the two ends of the connection worked here.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

India: When Most Workers Have No Employer

Every tool in the anchor course, the election, the contract, the grievance procedure, the duty to bargain, assumes one thing so basic it is never said out loud: that a worker is an employee, and an employee has an employer. India is where that assumption breaks. About 90% of Indian workers are in informal employment (India Employment Report 2024, ILO and the Institute for Human Development, built on the government's own Periodic Labour Force Survey): no written contract, no social security, often no identifiable employer at all. This course teaches what that number means and where it comes from; the full legal machine India built on paper (a union with seven members, a constitution that guarantees association, and a Supreme Court that found no fundamental right to strike); union federations that each belong to a political party, a third politics-and-labor entanglement to set against Poland and China; SEWA, the Self-Employed Women's Association, which since 1972 has organized millions of women who have no employer to bargain with, the one institutional invention in this track built for exactly that; the 2019-2020 Labour Codes that folded 29 laws into four and then waited five years to come into force (taught dated, because the states are still writing their rules); the first legal recognition of gig and platform workers anywhere in this track; and the honest part, caste and labor, the sewer deaths a ministry reported to Parliament in the same breath as 'no manual scavenging,' and child labor's real progress and real limits. Cited to the ILO, the Periodic Labour Force Survey, the Codes' own text, parliamentary answers, and SEWA's own record. A country course in the Workers' Rights track, take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Mudsock: How a Rivalry Marks a Boundary

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Fishers and Hamilton County, Indiana, built around one civic question: how does a suburb form, and who pays for what. This is the counterweight to Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It. That course follows a Black business corridor that was cleared; this one follows the ground that grew, twenty miles northeast, over the same decades, under a different set of legal instruments. You will learn where the name Mudsock comes from and what a nickname is and is not evidence of, read a county's growth out of the decennial census instead of out of a slogan, look at the subdivision and the campus high school as building types with assumptions built into them, and then spend the longest section of the course on the instruments themselves: incorporation, annexation and the remonstrance waiver almost nobody reads, the school district line drawn under Indiana's 1959 School Reorganization Act, and the property tax caps that decide when a wealthy district still has to ask its voters for money. You will test the claim in this course's own title against the record and watch part of it fail, look up a real parcel and a real taxing district in Indiana's public finance database, find the school referendum currently on the November 2026 ballot, and write a piece of grounded nonfiction about one street or one boundary. A virtual tour of the Mudsock rivalry and its ground is planned and will be added to the Now section when its embed URL exists.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Philadelphia: The University and the Block

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on the Black Bottom in West Philadelphia: the working-class Black neighborhood that was certified as blighted and cleared in the 1960s so that a consortium of universities led by the University of Pennsylvania could build the University City Science Center, the nation's first urban research park. This is the second metro-spine course after the Indianapolis pilot, and it exists to test one argument: that the Black Bottom is Indiana Avenue's closest twin anywhere, because the instrument that did the work at both campuses is the same, a university assembling land through a public redevelopment authority under a 1945 state blight statute. The prerequisite courses teach the method and the model: The Green Book: How to Read a Route teaches you to read a record and research an address forward, and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It found that a university plus a redevelopment authority, not the highway, cleared that corridor. This course draws the comparison explicitly and stays precise about what is parallel and what is merely similar. You will learn the certification instrument under Pennsylvania's Urban Redevelopment Law, eminent domain and federal urban-renewal financing, and the West Philadelphia Corporation as the university's land-assembly surrogate; you will handle, with care and by way of the official commission report, a second and very different West Philadelphia decision, the MOVE bombing of 1985; you will look up a real parcel in the city's own Atlas, find the live civics of Penn's payments to the schools, and write a piece of grounded nonfiction. A 360 tour of the corridor is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Pittsburgh: Where the Playbook Was Written

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Pittsburgh's Hill District: the majority-Black neighborhood that Harlem Renaissance poet Claude McKay called the Crossroads of the World, home of the Pittsburgh Courier and the Crawford Grill and the Hill District of August Wilson's ten-play cycle, and the Lower Hill of it that was declared blighted and cleared in the 1950s for the Civic Arena. This is a sibling of the Indiana Avenue course, and it goes one step further: Indianapolis did not invent the instruments that emptied Indiana Avenue, and neither did Pittsburgh, but Pittsburgh assembled and showcased the public-private redevelopment machine early and visibly enough that the postwar Pittsburgh Renaissance became a national reference case. This course applies the prerequisite Green Book method to one neighborhood, teaches the actual tools of the decision (the state redevelopment law, the blight designation, eminent domain, the public-private partnership, and the export of the model), tests the course's own headline claim against the record and reports where it weakens, looks at the arena as architecture and at the rare double absence left when that arena was itself demolished around 2011 to 2012, sends the learner to Allegheny County's own parcel records and to Pittsburgh's unfinished comprehensive plan, and ends in an August Wilson writing assignment. A 360 tour of the Lower Hill is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Pre-Columbian Mesoamerica: Cities, Calendars, and the People Who Are Still Here

Before any European ship reached the Americas, the land between central Mexico and Costa Rica held some of the largest cities on Earth, a fully developed writing system, a positional number system with zero, calendars accurate enough to track Venus for centuries, and farms engineered on lakes and in rainforests. This course walks that record: the Olmec of the Gulf lowlands and the live scholarly debate about what they were to everyone else; Teotihuacan, a metropolis of perhaps 100,000 whose builders' very language is unknown, the best humility lesson in archaeology; the Maya city-states, their script and Long Count calendar, the real (and really debated) Classic collapse, and the roughly seven million Maya alive right now, because they did not vanish; the Mexica (Aztec) island capital of Tenochtitlan, its chinampa farms and tribute empire, and an honest accounting of human sacrifice, real, excavated, and routinely exaggerated by sources with motives; the Zapotec, Mixtec, and the Purepecha empire that stopped the Aztecs cold; Central America beyond Mexico, from the buried village of Joya de Ceren to the stone spheres of the Diquis delta; and the conquest told without myths, smallpox and steel, yes, but also tens of thousands of Indigenous allies who were fighting their own war, and a 'conquest' that did not reach the last independent Maya kingdom until 1697. The last section teaches the transferable skill: HOW we know, a bishop's book-burning at Mani in 1562 and the four codices that survived it, the Cold War decipherment that let the Maya speak in their own words, and the LiDAR surveys that found tens of thousands of structures under the Peten canopy in a single campaign. Numbers are taught as ranges, contested claims are labeled contested with a name on each side, and nothing here is 'mysterious ancient aliens', the mystery-mongering is itself one of the myths this course dismantles. Cited throughout to working Mesoamericanists (Coe, Houston, Miller, Martin, Restall, Cowgill, Smith), INAH excavation reporting, the Popol Vuh and Florentine Codex in scholarly translation, and UNESCO World Heritage documentation.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Seattle: The Modern Bookend

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Seattle: who could live where, the neighborhoods that racial restriction built, and the two Supreme Court opinions that bracket a single argument thirty-three years apart. The building block is a boundary you cannot photograph. You will read Seattle out of a rare searchable primary archive, the University of Washington's Racial Restrictive Covenants Project, which has documented tens of thousands of deeds that once barred nonwhite families from most of the city. You will sit with the Central District, the corridor where a constrained Black Seattle built a full community, and with Bainbridge Island, the place the first forced removal of Japanese Americans began in 1942, now marked by a memorial the community keeps. Then you will read two opinions directly. Milliken v. Bradley (1974) stopped a court-ordered desegregation remedy at the school district line: it limited what a court could compel. Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007) stopped a district that had never been segregated by law from using race in school assignment: it limited what a district could choose to do voluntarily. You will quote the operative language of both, including the plurality and concurrence split in Parents Involved that decides what the case actually held, correct what it is popularly said to have held, look up a real covenant or parcel in the public records, learn how Seattle assigns students today, and write one grounded, checkable piece. Prerequisites: The Green Book: How to Read a Route (the method) and The Gym and the Color Line (the district-line course this one bookends). A 360 tour of the ground is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

South Africa: The Union That Helped End Apartheid, Then Joined the Government

Apartheid South Africa put Black workers outside labor law by name: the Industrial Conciliation Act of 1924 wrote them out of the word "employee," a 1953 statute criminalised their strikes, and "job reservation" saved the best jobs for white workers by law, the bluntest version of the exclusion move this track finds in country after country. This course follows what the excluded built anyway: the leaderless Durban strikes of 1973, the shop-steward unions that became COSATU in 1985 (about 460,000 members at launch, South African History Online), the three-week miners' strike of 1987, and the Tripartite Alliance with the ANC that helped end apartheid in 1994. Then it follows the harder story after the victory. The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 is among the most worker-friendly statutes anywhere, written partly by the unionists who had just won, and yet official unemployment stands at 32.9% (Q1 2025, Stats SA), labor broking moves workers outside the paper protections, and on 16 August 2012 police of the democratic state shot dead 34 striking miners at Marikana. That day is taught soberly, from the published findings of the Farlam Commission, what it found, what it did not find, and what is still unresolved, dated and left open. The course ends with the fracture the alliance produced, NUMSA expelled in 2014, the rival SAFTU federation founded in 2017, and with a question borrowed from this track's Poland course, offered and not answered: can a union movement win the state without losing the workplace? Cited to South African History Online, the statutes themselves, Stats SA, the ILO and the Marikana Commission report. A country course in the Workers' Rights track, take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

South Korea: Democracy, the Chaebol, and the Lawsuit as a Weapon

South Korea compresses a century of labor history into four decades. Under Park Chung-hee's developmental dictatorship, cheap and tightly controlled labor was not a side effect of the economic miracle, it was the policy, and the teenage women sewing in the Peace Market's attic workshops paid for it. On 13 November 1970 a 22-year-old tailor named Jeon Tae-il burned himself alive beside a copy of the Labor Standards Act the state refused to enforce; his reported last words, "We are not machines", became the founding sentence of the modern Korean labor movement, and his mother Lee So-sun spent the next four decades building the unions her son died asking for. In the summer of 1987, as the dictatorship cracked, more than three thousand strikes erupted in three months, the Great Workers' Struggle, and Korean workers won their unions and their democracy in the same season. Then the honest part: a wealthy OECD democracy that ratified the ILO's freedom-of-association conventions only in 2021; a workforce where 38.2% of wage workers are 'non-regular' (August 2025, Statistics Korea) and stand outside most of what the unions won; union density of about 13% (2022, Ministry of Employment and Labor) with bargaining coverage barely higher, because bargaining stops at the company gate; and a repression mechanism students will not have seen anywhere else in this track, civil damages suits and provisional seizure of wages and homes brought against individual strikers, which can financially destroy a worker without ever jailing one. The decade-long fight over that mechanism, the 'yellow envelope law,' is taught dated and unresolved. A country course in the Workers' Rights track, take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Sweden & Denmark: The Wage Floor That Isn't a Law

In Sweden and Denmark there is almost no statutory national minimum wage, and that is not an oversight. It is the design. The wage floor is a contract, negotiated industry by industry between unions and employers, and the state deliberately stays out. For a student raised on "the government sets the floor," this is the most disorienting fact in the whole Workers' Rights track, and this course is built around it. You will learn the plumbing that makes it work: the Ghent system, in which unemployment insurance is run through union-linked funds, which pushes union membership toward two-thirds of the workforce, and the natural experiment that proves it, because Norway, a Nordic country WITHOUT Ghent, sits around half. You will see the strongest evidence for that mechanism anywhere: when Sweden raised its unemployment-fund fees in 2007, density fell, fast. You will meet the two agreements by which the state stepped back on purpose, Saltsjöbaden (Sweden, 1938) and the September Compromise (Denmark, 1899), and the Danish bargain called flexicurity: easy to fire, well cushioned if you are, and actively helped back to work, taught as a trade rather than a fairy tale, and honestly, as a trade under strain. You will learn the sharpest single comparison in the track: sympathy strikes, which US law bans, are legal here, and you will watch the model defend itself in real time in the still-unresolved 2023 Tesla dispute in Sweden. Then the honest limits: density is falling, migrant and platform workers sit outside the agreements, and (the lesson nobody expects) the Nordic unions themselves fought an EU law that would have guaranteed a minimum wage, because a legal floor would undercut the thing they built. Cited to OECD/AIAS, ETUI, Eurofound, the national confederations, and the EU directive itself. A country course in the Workers' Rights track, take "The History of Unions: America and the World" first.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

The Gym and the Color Line

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Indianapolis high school gymnasiums and football fields, and on the one civic instrument that decides who plays in them: the school district line. Indiana builds the largest high school gyms in the United States, and it built Crispus Attucks High School in 1927 as the segregated Black high school for a city whose school board had been asked to build it. Attucks was kept out of the state tournament until 1942, sat on 8.4 acres when the state's own formula asked for more than three times that, and then won the state championship in 1955, 1956 and 1959. The building type is the hook. The boundary is the lesson. You will read three court opinions directly, United States v. Board of School Commissioners (1971 and 1974) and Milliken v. Bradley (1974), and watch a federal judge find that more than ninety percent of about 350 attendance-zone changes promoted segregation, watch the 1969 Unigov statute expand a city's limits while expressly leaving its school district where it was, and watch the Supreme Court turn the district line into a wall the remedy could not cross. Then you will test that argument against a chronology, correct two claims this course could not verify, look up a real school's district and its boundary in the federal and state records, and write about one gym. Prerequisites: The Green Book: How to Read a Route (the method) and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It (course 1, the same metro). A 360 tour of the gyms and fields is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

The Negro Leagues: Who Owned the Game

A cited, high-school-and-up course on the Negro Leagues as businesses rather than as a tragedy that ended in 1947. The civic question runs through every section: who owns the game, who collects the gate, and what happens to those businesses when the door finally opens? You will read a league the way you would read any firm, out of charters, leases, newspaper business pages, museum and Hall of Fame records and Major League Baseball's own published methodology: who put up the capital when banks would not lend, which clubs owned a ballpark and which rented one from the white club that had refused them the locker rooms, what a booking agent took between the turnstile and the owner, and why barnstorming and one all-star game at Comiskey Park mattered more to the books than the standings did. Indianapolis is the course's worked example, because the record there is unusually good: the ABCs from a contested sponsorship name in 1907 to a folded franchise in 1926, the Negro National League's first game at Washington Park on 2 May 1920, C. I. Taylor's clubhouse on Indiana Avenue built because his players were locked out of the one at the park, and the Indianapolis Clowns, who bought a league seat in 1943 by itemizing what they would cut from the act and outlived the leagues by thirty-five years. The last section is about the record itself: MLB's December 2020 reclassification of seven leagues, the May 2024 statistical merge of more than 2,300 players, and what is genuinely contested about both, including a qualifying threshold set at about 1,800 at-bats where the American and National Leagues use 5,000, an official record that excludes the barnstorming games that paid the bills, and two reputable databases that currently disagree about who holds the single-season batting record. Negro Leagues statistics are incomplete and under active revision, and this course says so wherever a number appears instead of quoting one with false confidence. It states plainly which figures it refused to assert and why. Cross-linked to What They Built, Financing Without Access, Two Racetracks, The Gym and the Color Line, Indiana Avenue, and Pittsburgh.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

The President's House

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on the Benjamin Harrison house at 1230 North Delaware Street in Indianapolis, and on the question a president's house is the right place to ask: what could a presidency do about voting rights, and what happened when it tried? This is course 5 of the Indianapolis cluster and its civics anchor, and it is the one course in the series whose subject is a person with power rather than a place that lost it. Benjamin Harrison, the 23rd president, lived and died in this house. During his single term a bill to put federal supervisors on congressional elections passed the House, was filibustered in a Senate that had no way to end a filibuster, and was set aside by one vote. You will read the bill, read Harrison's own messages, watch a bill die by the ordinary machinery rather than by a losing vote, and then test the flattering version of the story against the parts of his record that do not fit it, including the Geary Act and Wounded Knee. You will read the house itself as architecture and as a museum, and learn the difference between what a building is and what a preserved building has been chosen to show. Finally you will connect a failed federal remedy in 1891 to a local boundary decision in this same city in 1970, because national power and local boundaries are two levers on the same question. A 360 tour of the site is planned and will be added to the Now section when its embed URL exists. The prerequisite course, The Green Book: How to Read a Route, teaches the research method this course applies.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

The Schoolhouse Network

A cited, high-school-and-up course on the Rosenwald school building program: roughly five thousand school buildings raised across the segregated South in the early twentieth century, on a matching model that combined a Chicago philanthropist's grant, public tax money, and cash, land and labor raised by Black communities themselves. It is the counterpart to The Gym and the Color Line, which teaches what a boundary did to schooling; this course teaches what communities built, and it runs on one hard rule stated in its first lesson: never use a positive to soften a negative. A school raised by people who were simultaneously being taxed for schools their children could not attend is not a happy ending, and this course does not offer it as one. The claim is co-occurrence, not balance. You will verify the famous numbers and find that the sources disagree about the building count, the date range and even the number of students served, then learn why they disagree. You will read the matching model as a four-column budget and work out what share the communities actually paid, which is the figure that complicates the way this story is usually told. You will read two real school cards out of the Julius Rosenwald Fund archive at Fisk University. You will learn why the buildings look the way they do, down to the orientation, the window banks and the two permitted interior paint schemes, because the light was the design problem. You will meet the people who raised the money and taught in the rooms. Then you will hold the program's calendar against the rest of the record for the same years, find a surviving school near you in the federal and state registers, and write a piece of grounded nonfiction about one building and the budget line that raised it. Prerequisite: The Green Book: How to Read a Route, which teaches the method this course applies. A 360 tour of a restored schoolhouse is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Training the Colonizer: The Knowledge That Was Taken

When Europeans built plantation economies in the Americas, they grew crops they did not know how to grow, on land they did not know how to work, using techniques they did not invent. This course walks the documented record of what enslaved and colonized people taught the people who enslaved them: West African rice-growers whose expertise fed the Carolina Lowcountry; the enslaved man Onesimus, who taught Cotton Mather the African practice of smallpox inoculation before the 1721 Boston epidemic; the herders, indigo-makers, blacksmiths, bridge-builders, boat-pilots, and cooks whose skill built colonial wealth. It is careful where the record is careful. The famous Black Rice thesis (Judith Carney, 2001) is taught as a thesis, alongside the scholars who challenged it (Eltis, Morgan, and Richardson, 2007) and those who answered them, with no winner declared, because learning to hold a contested claim honestly is one of the skills this course is really teaching. It refuses the two opposite lies: the old erasure that says Europeans built everything, and the romantic overcorrection that says Africans invented everything without a citation. And it never lets the story go soft: this knowledge was coerced, uncredited, and uncompensated. Being the person who knew how to grow the rice did not make you free. Cited throughout to working historians (Carney, Wood, Littlefield, Hawthorne, Hall, Dawson, Feeser, Schiebinger) and the Mather and Boylston primary record. For high school students.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Two Racetracks

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on the two racetracks of Indianapolis and the civic question that runs between them: who is admitted to a sport, and what gets built alongside when they are not? Five miles apart sit a 2.5-mile oval that opened in 1909, was paved with 3.2 million bricks, became a National Historic Landmark in 1987 and still runs the race it was built for, and a one-mile dirt oval that opened with the state fairgrounds in 1892, held the largest annually staged Black sporting event in America between 1924 and 1936, and was converted in 2019 to a crushed-limestone harness training surface and parking. Between 1924 and 1936 the Colored Speedway Association ran the Gold and Glory Sweepstakes on that dirt mile, because the premier race would not admit Black drivers; the first Black driver started the Indianapolis 500 in 1991, eighty years and seventy-five runnings after the first. This course does not repeat the story it inherited. It goes looking for the written rule that is supposed to sit under it, reports that it could not find one, and teaches the far more useful thing it found instead: how a license, an entry form, a club membership and a private gate can do the work of a rule while leaving almost no record. You will learn what an oval does to a farm and a town, why the Town of Speedway is one of the four places the 1970 Unigov consolidation left alone, who governs each of these two grounds today (one is private property, one is a state body corporate and politic, one is a town with its own redevelopment commission chartered to eliminate blight), test a claim against the record and watch part of it fail, look up a real parcel and a real public meeting, and write one piece of grounded nonfiction. Prerequisites: The Green Book: How to Read a Route (the method) and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It (course 1, the same metro and the same instruments). A 360 tour of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway is planned and will be added to the Now section when its embed URL exists.

Coming soon
🕒 Coming soon

Washington, DC: Where the Instrument Was Blessed

A cited, high-school-and-up site course on Southwest Washington, DC, and Berman v. Parker (1954), the Supreme Court decision that made clearing land as "blighted" constitutionally safe across the whole country. The pilot course in this series found that a blight designation and land assembly, not the highway, actually cleared Indiana Avenue in Indianapolis. This is the course where that tool was authorised. Its prerequisites, The Green Book: How to Read a Route and Indiana Avenue: A District and What Replaced It, teach a method and apply it to one corridor; this course reads the opinion that licensed the method, quotes its operative language accurately, and is honest about what it did and did not hold, including that the plaintiff was a department store owner rather than a displaced resident. You will walk Southwest DC before clearance and read the surveys the Court relied on, see the modernist superblocks that replaced a working neighborhood, learn the instruments beat by beat, trace the holding forward to Kelo and back to Indiana Avenue while testing that link against a chronology, meet the freeway revolt that is one of the few victories in this series, learn why the people whose homes were cleared could not vote for the Congress that governed them, look up a real DC parcel, and write grounded nonfiction about one block. A 360 tour of the waterfront is planned and will be added to the Now section when it is captured.

Coming soon